Global Health

What Can We Learn from Abortion Access?

Published August 24, 2009 @ 08:34AM PT

(photo credit: Alexandra Lee)

A few weeks ago, I talked about the multiple meanings of access to health care, focusing on the fact that access is always more complex than you expect. A recent report on abortion access in the US brought that home to me.

The Alan Guttmacher Institute reports that mifepristone for medication abortion was expected to widely expand abortion access in the United States. That promise has not come true. Instead, new research found that "most medication abortions were performed at or near facilities that also provided surgical abortions." In other words, ten years after the abortion pill became available, access to abortion is still linked to being near a medical facility that provides abortions.

What happened? The article doesn't speculate on why mifepristone hasn't improved access to abortion, but I have a theory. I think they misunderstood exactly what the barrier to abortion access was.

The barrier wasn't providers who were capable of providing abortions. Just about every obstetrician is capable of performing an abortion. A vacuum-aspiration abortion is a very easy procedure to perform - one of the easiest. A dilation and curettage isn't much more difficult, and it is called for in situations unrelated to abortion, such as when removing fibroids from the uterus.

The true barrier to abortion access is providers who are willing to perform an abortion. Some providers are morally opposed to abortion provision. Others are unwilling to risk the threats and violence that go along with being an abortion provider. And doctors who are unwilling to provide surgical abortions are also unwilling to prescribe an abortion pill.

So, ten years after the abortion pill was introduced, American women who have access to a health care provider who does abortions can choose between a surgical abortion and a medication abortion. And women who don't have access to that kind of provider are still screwed.

Related Posts

Comments (1)

  1. Rev Bookburn

    The anti-choice harassers and terrorists have no hesitation to threatening providers of medicinal abortion. As long as law enforcement, federal marshalls and Homeland Security (it was ok to harass Grandmothers For Peace, but anti-choice terrorists are no big deal!) refuse to adequately do their jobs, access will continue to decline. Access should be expanded, including late-term abortions. Abortion should also be included in health-care reform. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta

    Posted by Rev Bookburn on 08/24/2009 @ 02:49PM PT

  2. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Alanna Shaikh

Alanna Shaikh has spent the last ten years immersed in global health; she has worked for NGOs, companies, universities, and the US government on projects that ranged from preventing antibacterial resistance to improving maternal and child health.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel