Global Health

Global Health Ideas for Change – My Thoughts

Published January 05, 2009 @ 10:01PM PT

(photo credit: Mr. T in DC)

Let me start off by saying that I have nothing to do with the ideas for change selection of this site. It's based on how many votes each idea gets. The topic editors have no special say in which ideas move forward and which don't. So this is my opinion on each of the three ideas in the Global Health category, but I don't have any extra weight in the voting.  Don't take my word for anything; go check each idea out for yourself before you do any voting.

Idea # 1 - Peace Care -- Bring Together Peace Corps and Resident Physicians to Impact Global Health

Summary: Peace Care would have Peace Corps volunteers partner with an American residency programs to do exchanges.  The goal is to build long-term health system capacity in developing countries.

I strongly agree with the premise of this idea. Global health disparities are severe, and health systems in developing countries are in desperate need of support. Additional staff and training would be of real assistance.

However, I am not convinced that Peace Care would be the best way of achieving that outcome. Exchanges are always expensive. Airfare, housing, and insurance add up fast. It might be better to use the funds you would have spent flying a resident to support local master trainers in training physicians, or some other project to improve health system capacity. Secondly, it is very hard to maintain the impact of exchange programs. Once participants pass through the program, their efforts are often lost. Lastly, I really can't tell for sure what the residents are bringing to the table. How exactly will they build local capacity?

Idea #2 - Invest in health workers to improve the health of the poor

Summary: The US should increase investment in human capital for global health, by creating a corps of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, lab technicians and computer specialists and deploying them to hard-hit countries lacking health infrastructure. The US should also support the training and employment of community health workers in these countries.

Once again, I agree wholeheartedly with the premise here. Human capital for improving global health is an extremely important issue. Health care providers are an key part of improving human health, as are health systems.

I have concerns, though, about the ability of a few individual advisors to change entire health care systems for the better. Systemic change takes money and political will. The idea does not mention budgets for these advisors to spend, and I think that people who stay in a country for 1-3 years will not be able to develop the political traction to bring about change. This idea is similar to both the Liberia Fellows program, and the USAID global health fellows program. We could look to their experience to see if this one would work.

As for the second part of the idea - I love training community health workers. I am totally on board with that. And working through existing funding mechanisms is the fastest, most efficient way to do it.

Idea #3 - Save Children from Preventable Diseases

Summary: Fight preventable causes of child death by supporting low cost interventions, and do more research on ways to reduce child mortality.

Overall, I think this idea is great. There are so many things we can do to save children's lives - water filters, vaccinations, oral rehydration salts. These are proven to work, and don't cost much. Several of them have been included in the Copenhagen Consensus. We can protect vulnerable children using tools that actually work. We should do so, immediately.

My concern about this idea is that it is so broad. It includes vaccine research, water filters, vaccine research, and more. That is a lot to implement and to track and evaluate. Focusing on one aspect or child mortality might be a more effective way to go.

All in all, I think each of the three ideas represents some serious thought about global health and how to make it better. We've got something to learn from all three.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. carolyn jones

    I beleive in Health Freedom. Being allowed to mix Traditional and western Medicine,I am allergic to medication and rely or alternative as well as traditional.With so many people in the world having the same and similar problems , we should be open to all wellness ideas world wide.The deaths,and addictions from drugs alone should  speak loud and clear

    Posted by carolyn jones on 01/06/2009 @ 07:50AM PT

  2. Rani P

    I think investing in health care workers is a great idea, but I wonder if you had any thoughts about the challenge of retention.  I remember reading that due to the shortage of health care workers globally, workers were often hired away after they had completed more advanced training.  That's not to say it isn't a worthwhile idea, but what are people doing to try to keep good people working in the system once trained?

    Posted by Rani P on 01/06/2009 @ 08:38AM PT

  3. dan dawson

    To heal the body, heal the earth.  Utilizing Organic Agriculture for proper nutrition and Green Technology to create and regenerate non-toxic environments are really pragmatic ways to sustain health in all the people of the earth.  In addition to empowering people with the necessary resources to become regionally independent as well as educating in these innovative fields, the co-oping of peoples abilities into a fair-trade economy will further sustain health by sustaining economy.  For those in a health crisis-can anyone say Green Pharmacy!

    Posted by dan dawson on 01/06/2009 @ 08:50AM PT

  4. brandon schvitz

    I completely agree that nutrition education is ANYONES best bet for positive change.   Since most diseases, disorders, causes of death are completely avoidable (ie: cancer, heart disease, kidney failure, etc) We must wake everyone up to the fact that pills cannot substitute a healthy lifestyle.   

    Posted by brandon schvitz on 01/06/2009 @ 07:58PM PT

  5. Ryan Jense

    Alanna,
    We share a passion.  I am dedicated to improving global healthcare capacity through systematic mechanisms.  I have an idea that involves significant changes in the way that we train residents in the United States.  My colleagues and I have been working on a plan to integrate global health curriculum into residency programs across the nation.  This will involve fundamental changes in our current system.  We believe that US academic medical training programs can lead the development and growth of global healthcare capacity throughout the world.  This change will require focused dedication to this pursuit and significant continuous funding.  Please read the discussion below to get a better idea of this project.  
    Cheers,
    Ryan


    Growing A New Global Surgical Workforce: A “Peace Corps” of US Resident Physicians 

    By:  Ryan Jense, MD
    University of Washington
    Department of Anesthesiology


    Although many facets of humanity can and do provide valuable energies to stabilize the human ‘super structure’, the United States academic medical education system has only begun its entrance into this field. I believe this to be an incredibly important step towards a quantum leap in stability. If value recognition is added at the highest levels to improving global wellbeing, the United States can further establish its positive leadership role in global citizenry.

    We have reached a period of global interconnectedness in which the Federal government and the individual US medical societies should consider revising their mission statements to further reflect their dedication to improving global wellbeing. The Obama administration and congress in collaboration with the Institute of Medicine, American Association of Medical Colleges, American College of Graduate Medical Education, Association of Academic Health Centers, and the departmental Residency Review Committees can support and guide this process.


    As an anesthesiologist, I have focused my efforts on global surgical disease, but please understand this logic could be applied to all medical specialties. I have been pursuing an idea that will help bridge the surgical gap of humanity, and in the process, improve the lives of millions. It is a result of, and a response to, evolving global health interests circulating within our communities and our institutions. This idea requires changing culture within the United States medical education system.


    Injury prevention and basic surgical care are increasingly recognized as important cost-effective components of global health. Worsening political-economic disparities and global industrialization are greatly responsible for the growing surgical burden. The resulting violence and rapid introduction of mechanization into countries with minimal regulatory systems and dismal surgical care infrastructure have accelerated injury related death and disability worldwide.


    The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that one million people die from road traffic accidents (RTA) each year, with 50% being between the age of 15 and 44 years. A much greater number are disabled from RTA’s. Violence, trauma, and routine surgical pathology also contribute greatly to the overall surgical burden. Furthermore, surgical health needs of women in developing countries continue to be grossly neglected. The WHO estimates that over 500,000 women die each year from complications related to pregnancy/childbirth, and approximately another 10 million suffer delivery-related injuries.


    Surgical disparities are ubiquitous. Vast majorities of the world’s population do not have access to basic surgical healthcare. Dismal surgical systems, and a grossly inadequate surgical workforce are to blame. I present you a mechanism that will alter this disparity.


    A growing set of data recognizes that US resident physicians are ready and eager to provide clinical, research and educational global health services while in training. This group of physicians represents the future of US and global medicine, and if given the chance, tomorrow they will begin to function in a synergistic way to help grow global medical capacity where it is needed most.


    Selected surgical training programs across the US will join forces. This coalition can be thought of as a “Peace Corps” of resident physicians. International global health electives will be integrated into these surgical residency programs. Each program will devote intellectual and human resources to a select international site. Resident and attending physicians (A.K.A. - the doctors who train the residents) will rotate to these sites and serve a clinical, research, and educational role on a continuous year-round basis.


    Through careful evaluation, and in coordination with international medical officials, a rigorous curriculum will be developed to serve the needs of the international sites. These curriculums, coupled with appropriate health systems planning, will result in the massive growth of international surgical capacity. The endpoint is the formation of self-sustaining surgical systems at each international site. When that important threshold is met, the model will transition to another site and begin again.


    This is an idea of scale, but most importantly, of potential. A tremendous increase in the global surgical workforce will be realized through the sheer number of US physicians serving internationally, and more importantly, through the systematic training of international local providers who will continue to serve in their respective communities.


    Underserved international communities will benefit greatly from the implementation of collaborative surgical systems centered on a chosen district level hospital. These “hospitals of surgical excellence” will provide perioperative and surgical services to a grossly underserved population, and will permanently serve as centers of research and medical education for the local population. Beyond the core mission, these centers will support political-economic stability, and also instill a sense of community pride.


    A fully funded pilot program is essential to the growth of this idea. We have taken preliminary steps at the University of Washington (UW) to initiate this process. We aim to create an “International Surgical Care Center” within UW Health Sciences to attract expert faculty from around the world to achieve the following goals:

    1. Develop specific curriculum to grow the global surgical healthcare workforce through training of international providers and UW personnel.

    2. Integrate year-round global health electives into UW surgical residency programs such that resident-attending pairs will function in an educational, research and clinical capacity.

    3. Integrate UW capacity into a specific international site to construct/enhance sustainable education, research, and clinical capacity.

    4. Provide training in creation and evaluation of surgical infrastructure (initial response, trauma care, etc.) through the UW Harborview Injury Prevention Center.

    5. Attract worldwide expertise and become the model academic clinical educational global outreach research center.

    We aim to enhance global surgical systems and grow a highly qualified global surgical workforce through the maintenance of numerous collaborative and parallel relationships. A coalition of US academic surgical residency programs will be the driving energy to provide clinical and educational expertise to selected international partners. They will be responsible for maintaining high quality clinical/educational curriculum and expertise for targeted low-income populations.


    An umbrella entity such as the World Health Organization will oversee and maintain communication with international Ministries of Health and other officials to promote the relationships between the US academic programs and their partners. Most importantly, our international partners will lead in the evaluation and evolution of site-specific educational models and curriculum to best serve their goals.


    Gross success will be measured by evaluating the number of:

    1) International students trained

    2) Self-sustaining global surgical centers created

    3) Patients treated

    4) US physicians practicing abroad


    I believe the Obama administration will assist in stabilizing the human ‘super structure’ on countless fronts. Value recognition in the form of new humanitarian foreign policy, such as an initiative directed to create and sustain a “peace corps” of global US resident physicians, is a great way to assist this effort. Let’s further embrace our interconnectedness and give the stars to our children.

    Ryan J. Jense, MD
    University of Washington
    Department Of Anesthesiology  

    Posted by Ryan Jense on 01/06/2009 @ 09:27PM PT

  6. Henry Jones

    We need to combat the key causes of The Global Health Epidemic - things like climate change have all played a huge role in the onslaught?

    Posted by Henry Jones on 06/09/2009 @ 04:05AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Alanna Shaikh

Alanna Shaikh has spent the last ten years immersed in global health; she has worked for NGOs, companies, universities, and the US government on projects that ranged from preventing antibacterial resistance to improving maternal and child health.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.